Hawthorn Close Residents
Hawthorn Close & Cranborne Avenue residents · Hitchin

Work on an 18m phone mast began Monday 24 August — unlawfully.

A 20m mast here was refused last year. Prior approval for this one has not been received by Council — yet contractors have started.

Prior approval has not been received by Council. The Council says works without it are unlawful. Report what you see: phone the Council on 01462 474000 (ask for Planning Enforcement) or email planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk.
The site, Monday 24 August: existing lamp-post, cabinets and road-closure signs
Work has started. Don’t argue with the contractors — photograph it and phone the Council: 01462 474000 More →
The facts

Three things to know

1

A 20m mast here was refused

June 2025. North Herts Council said no — too big, wrong place, too ugly.

2

Now they want 18m — with no approval

March 2026. Prior approval has not been received by Council, which has confirmed in writing that it is required.

3

If they apply properly, you get a say

A proper application means letters, a site notice and a chance to object. We’ll email you the moment it happens.

How big is 18 metres?

More than twice the height of the houses

Height comparison: 8m house, 9m lamp-post, 18m proposed mast, 20m refused mast 0 m 5 m 10 m 15 m 20 m House · ~8 m Lamp-post today · 9 m Proposed now · 18 m Refused 2025 · 20 m
From the operator’s own drawing

“250 Proposed Site Elevation A” — drawing 1205960_NHE089_16912_SG0302_M004 (rev M004, 12 Feb 2026)

18.0m “Alpha 8” pole

New monopole on a new T9 root foundation, painted green, with 3 Alpha AW3363 antennas at the top (top of antennas +18.0m, centre-line +16.6m). 12 feeders pre-rigged inside the pole.

6m above the trees

The drawing marks tree level at about +12.0m and roof level nearby at about +4.9m. The existing equipment is on a 9.0m lamp-post, which would be removed.

Shared EE / Three site

Titled “Vendor swap — detailed design” for EE and H3G (Three) via MBNL; designed by KTL. Site ref 1205960 “LP Hawthorn Avenue”, address “Opposite 53 Hawthorn Close, Hitchin, SG5 2BP”.

Cabinets at the base

A new EE “Porter” cabinet on the existing plinth, alongside the existing Dorset, Ericsson 6130, bowler and Mk4 link cabinets. Existing feeder cables to be re-used.

Figures read from the operator’s elevation drawing submitted with notice 26/00508/EC. Heights are “AGL” (above ground level) as marked on the drawing.

In the Council’s words

What North Herts Council told us

Prior approval is required for the 18m mast and this has not been sought.

North Herts Council, August 2026

Any works would be unlawful and we would initiate an enforcement investigation.

North Herts Council, if work starts without approval
Current correspondence

What we’ve asked the Council — and their replies

The correspondence so far, 20–23 August 2026 — with North Herts Council, and now with EE. Personal details of residents and officers have been removed; councillors are named as public office-holders. The Council’s reply is shown in full.

1 · Residents → Council Wed 20 Aug 2026, 13:33 · to Planning Control, Planning Enforcement, the case officer; cc Cllr Chris Lucas, Cllr Keith Hoskins, Cllr Nigel Mason

Subject: URGENT: 26/00508/EC – 18m telecoms monopole at Hawthorn Close, Hitchin

Dear Planning Officer et al,

I am writing regarding the proposed telecommunications installation on land adjacent to 53 Hawthorn Close, Hitchin, and specifically the 2026 case 26/00508/EC. I have only just become aware of this proposal after seeing notices stating that “Essential Road Works” are due to commence next week in the vicinity of Hawthorn Close/Cranborne Avenue. Until this week, I had no knowledge that a revised telecommunications proposal had been submitted following the refusal of the previous scheme in 2025.

I am extremely concerned about both the proposal itself and, particularly, the process by which it appears to have been considered without any notification to local residents.

Previous 2025 proposal. The previous proposal, 25/01258/TD, involved a 20m telecommunications monopole at this location. It attracted very considerable local opposition, with more than 150 residents objecting, and Prior Approval was subsequently refused in June 2025. The strength of local feeling about a substantial telecommunications mast at this particular location was therefore very clearly known to the Council.

Revised 2026 proposal. I have now seen the drawings. The proposed monopole has been reduced from 20m to 18m, with changes to the antenna arrangement and associated equipment. Nevertheless, it remains a new and substantial freestanding monopole at the same location that was the subject of significant local objection and a refusal only last year. The elevation shows the surrounding tree level at approximately 12m, so the monopole would extend roughly 6m above the canopy.

Lack of consultation. The Council’s record for 26/00508/EC shows: received and validated 19 March 2026; neighbour consultation, standard consultation, advertisement and site notice all “Not Applicable”; decision made 30 March; issued 31 March; decision “No Objection”. As a result, the many residents who had objected to the previous proposal were given no notification and no opportunity to comment on the revised scheme.

I would be grateful for an urgent response to the following:

  1. Under precisely what statutory provision was 26/00508/EC submitted and considered?
  2. Why did the 2025 proposal require the Prior Approval procedure, whereas the 2026 proposal apparently did not?
  3. What specific differences between the refused 20m scheme and the 18m scheme meant the latter could be dealt with as a notification rather than through Prior Approval?
  4. On what legal basis was neighbour consultation, advertisement and a site notice considered “Not Applicable”?
  5. Given the known public interest in this site, was any consideration given to notifying residents even if statutory consultation was not required? If not, why not?
  6. Does the Council consider the 18m monopole now has all necessary authority to be installed, or is there any remaining process or consent required before installation can commence?
  7. Are the “Essential Road Works” advertised for next week connected with the installation of this monopole or its equipment?
  8. If so, who authorised those highway works, what do they involve, and on what dates?
  9. What opportunity is available to residents to raise concerns or challenge the installation before any irreversible works take place?

Having participated in a process last year in which more than 150 residents made their views known, those residents could reasonably have believed the matter had concluded when the proposal was refused. It is extremely concerning to discover — apparently only because roadworks notices appeared — that a revised 18m mast may have received a “No Objection” decision without residents being aware it was under consideration.

I would ask that this matter is treated as urgent in light of the roadworks advertised for next week, and that the Council confirm that steps can be taken to prevent installation of the monopole commencing while these questions are being addressed.

Kind regards

2 · Council → Residents Thu 20 Aug 2026, 18:32 · from the Senior Planning Officer, Development Management, North Herts Council

Thank you for your email and I understand your concerns.

Certain developments can be undertaken as ‘permitted development’. This is under national legislation — Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). The GPDO is statutory legislation, set at a national level. Part 16 of the GPDO refers to ‘Communications’ and sets out the criteria under which communications development can be considered permitted development. Class A refers to electronic communications code operators.

Some development that meets the permitted development criteria needs prior approval for siting and appearance from the Local Authority. Prior approval can be given or can be refused.

A new mast would be assessed under Class A of Part 16, Schedule 2 of the GPDO. A new mast of 30m or less may be permitted development. If it meets the permitted development criteria it would still require prior approval from the local authority over siting and design. A prior approval application would need to be submitted. Public consultation is undertaken by the local authority as part of the prior approval application process.

The 25/01258/TD application for a 20m mast was a prior approval application. Therefore consultation was undertaken. The application for prior approval was refused for the following reason: “result of the inappropriate scale, siting and appearance of the proposed 20 metre mast combined with the adverse impact from the amount and size of cabinets, that together would have a negative visual impact on the surrounding area.”

The 26/00508/EC case was not an application but a process where a notice is served on the local planning authority by the telecoms company that they intend to use their permitted development rights under Part 16 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO Class A. This case is a serving of a notice. It is not a planning application or an application seeking prior approval. It is therefore processed as such, and no consultation is undertaken for such cases as they are not a formal application but simply a serving of notice by the telecoms company.

In our response to the notice, we specified that it is the responsibility of the telecoms company to ensure that the proposal is permitted development and therefore whether prior approval is required.

It is our view that prior approval is required for the 18m mast and this has not been sought. If they proceed without planning permission or prior approval, any works would be unlawful and we would initiate an enforcement investigation.

We have notified the telecoms company today that notwithstanding the serving of the notice under 26/00508/EC, the new 18m mast would require prior approval to be sought and that if works are undertaken without this, we would initiate enforcement investigation.

I trust that the above is of assistance. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further queries or require clarification.

Kind regards,
Senior Planning Officer, Development Management, North Herts Council
Normal working hours: Monday and Thursday, 9.30am–5pm

3 · Residents → Council Thu 20 Aug 2026, 19:15 · cc Cllrs Lucas, Hoskins, Mason; Planning Enforcement

Thank you very much for your detailed and helpful response, and in particular for contacting the telecommunications company today. Your explanation has provided residents with some much-needed clarity.

As I understand the position from your email:

  • 26/00508/EC was not a planning or prior approval application and did not itself grant permission or prior approval for the proposed 18m mast. It was a notice served by the telecommunications company indicating its intention to rely upon permitted development rights.
  • Consequently, the absence of public consultation was because it was a notification rather than a prior approval application.
  • Most importantly, North Hertfordshire Council’s view is that prior approval is required for the proposed 18m mast and that prior approval has not been sought or obtained.
  • The Council has now notified the telecommunications company of this position.
  • If works to install the mast were undertaken without the necessary permission or prior approval, the Council considers those works would be unlawful and would initiate an enforcement investigation.
  • Should the company wish to proceed by submitting a prior approval application, residents would then have an opportunity to participate in the public consultation process.

This is particularly reassuring given the history of the site and the previous 25/01258/TD proposal, where prior approval for the 20m mast was refused because of the inappropriate scale, siting and appearance of the mast, together with the adverse visual impact of the associated cabinets.

What residents intend to do next. For the moment, residents do not intend to take any unnecessary further action while the company considers its position. If a prior approval application is submitted, we intend to engage constructively with the consultation process. In the meantime we will: keep a record of the existing installation and surrounding area; retain copies of correspondence and planning records; monitor the planning register for any new prior approval application; and monitor the forthcoming works in the Hawthorn Close/Cranborne Avenue area, particularly given the “Essential Road Works” notices.

One practical point: if contractors attend the site and appear to be commencing installation before prior approval has been obtained, could you confirm who residents should contact immediately at the Council, ideally with a mobile number? We would not interfere with contractors or works ourselves; we would record what is taking place from an appropriate location and report it promptly so officers can determine what action is required.

I would also be grateful if you could notify me, or ensure residents are notified, should a prior approval application be submitted, so that we do not miss the opportunity to participate in the consultation.

Kind regards

4 · Residents → Council Fri 21 Aug 2026, 10:58 · cc Cllrs Lucas, Hoskins, Mason; Planning Enforcement

Further to my previous email, I would be very grateful if arrangements could be made for a Council officer to attend the site should contractors arrive to commence installation of the proposed 18m mast before prior approval has been obtained.

Given the Council’s confirmation that such works would be unlawful, I feel it is important that residents are not placed in the position of having to challenge or question contractors ourselves. Having a Council representative attend would ensure that the situation can be dealt with promptly and appropriately.

I have copied our local councillors into this email and would also be very grateful if one of them could attend on the dates they have given to potentially start work, to avoid unnecessary confrontation for the residents.

Our only intention is to ensure that the Council’s position is respected and that installation does not take place before the required planning process has been completed.

Kind regards

5 · Council → Residents Sat 22 Aug 2026, 21:52 · from the Senior Planning Officer

Good evening,

Thank you for your email.

You will need to contact the enforcement team on the email below or call 01462 474000 and ask to speak to the enforcement team.

planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk

Many thanks
Senior Planning Officer, Development Management, North Herts Council

6 · Residents → Planning Enforcement Sun 23 Aug 2026, 12:16 · cc Cllr Chris Lucas, Cllr Keith Hoskins, Alistair Strathern MP

Subject: URGENT – Enforcement contact requested – 26/00508/EC, Hawthorn Close

Dear Planning Enforcement Team,

You have already been copied into my recent correspondence concerning the proposed 18m telecommunications monopole at Hawthorn Close (26/00508/EC). The Planning Officer has now specifically advised me to contact the Enforcement Team should works commence.

As confirmed in the earlier correspondence, North Herts Council’s position is that Prior Approval is required for the proposed 18m mast and has not been obtained, and that if works proceed without the necessary permission or Prior Approval, the works would be unlawful and an enforcement investigation would be initiated.

Given that “Essential Road Works” signs have recently appeared in the area and state that works will start tomorrow, 24 August, could you please:

  • acknowledge that the Enforcement Team is now aware of this matter; and
  • confirm the quickest procedure for residents to follow if contractors arrive and begin work on the proposed mast.

I understand that residents can telephone 01462 474000 and ask for the Enforcement Team / Duty Planning Officer. If there is a more direct contact number or named officer who could deal urgently with this particular matter, I would be very grateful if you could provide it.

Residents will, of course, not confront or obstruct contractors. We simply want to ensure that the Council can be alerted immediately should installation commence before the required Prior Approval has been obtained.

I would be grateful for acknowledgement of this email so that residents know the appropriate procedure to follow should these unlawful works begin.

Kind regards

7 · Residents → Planning Enforcement & councillors Sun 23 Aug 2026, 12:23 · cc Cllr Chris Lucas, Cllr Keith Hoskins, Alistair Strathern MP

Dear all,

Just to add to my email below, I have copied our local councillors into this correspondence so that they are also aware of the urgency of the situation.

Should contractors attend tomorrow and appear to commence installation of the 18m mast before Prior Approval has been obtained, I would be extremely grateful for the councillors’ assistance in ensuring that the matter is brought immediately to the attention of the appropriate Council officers and, if possible, for a councillor to attend the site.

Many thanks for your assistance.

Kind regards

8 · Residents → EE Sun 23 Aug 2026, 21:17 · to customer.complaints@ee.co.uk

Subject: URGENT – Works due to commence tomorrow morning – Hawthorn Close, Hitchin, SG5 2BP, 18m telecoms mast

Dear EE Network Deployment / Community Liaison Team,

Re: Proposed 18m telecommunications mast, Hawthorn Close, Hitchin — planning ref 26/00508/EC

I am contacting you as a matter of extreme urgency on behalf of concerned local residents regarding the proposed 18m telecommunications mast at Hawthorn Close.

  • North Herts Council has confirmed to us in writing that Prior Approval is required for this development and has not been obtained.
  • The Council has further confirmed that if works proceed without the necessary permission or Prior Approval, the works would be unlawful and an enforcement investigation would be initiated.
  • Works are due to commence tomorrow morning, Monday 24 August.
  • Preparatory activity has already taken place, including “Essential Road Works” signs and cones positioned along both sides of the road.
  • The Council’s Planning Enforcement Team and local councillors have already been alerted. In view of the imminent works and the unresolved planning position, we have also contacted the local press.

We urgently ask EE to confirm whether EE is the network operator responsible for this proposed installation; if so, to escalate this immediately to the appropriate Network Deployment team and contractors; and — most importantly — to instruct its contractors not to commence installation of the mast or associated works tomorrow morning until the planning position has been resolved with North Herts Council.

We hold the Council’s written correspondence confirming its position, together with a comprehensive photographic record of the preparations at the site, and can provide these immediately if required.

Given that contractors are expected tomorrow morning, we would be extremely grateful if this could be treated as an urgent out-of-hours escalation so that the appropriate contractor can be contacted before works commence. Please acknowledge receipt of this email and confirm urgently what action EE is taking.

Kind regards
On behalf of concerned local residents

9 · Residents → Planning Enforcement Mon 24 Aug 2026, 08:28 · cc the case officer, Planning Control, Cllrs Lucas & Hoskins, Alistair Strathern MP

Subject: 26/00508/EC – Media informed following commencement of works

Dear Planning Enforcement Team and Councillors,

Further to my previous correspondence regarding the proposed 18m telecommunications mast at Hawthorn Close (26/00508/EC), I wanted to make you aware that, following the commencement of works today, we (a large residents group) will now inform the local press/media of the situation.

We have taken this step reluctantly, but given North Herts Council’s written confirmation that Prior Approval is required and has not been obtained, and that works proceeding without the necessary permission or Prior Approval would be unlawful and subject to an enforcement investigation, residents feel that the circumstances are now a matter of legitimate public interest.

The media will be provided with a factual account of events, including the planning reference and the Council’s stated position, if we do not hear from you today. We have also made clear that the Council’s Planning Enforcement Team has been contacted, so that the Council has had the opportunity to address the situation through the appropriate channels.

Our overriding concern remains that no works should proceed unless and until the necessary planning requirements have been properly satisfied.

We would therefore be grateful for an urgent update confirming what action the Council is now taking and, in particular, whether steps are being taken to prevent any further works while the planning position remains unresolved.

We remain hopeful that this matter can be addressed promptly and appropriately.

Kind regards
On behalf of the local residents group

10 · Residents → local media Mon 24 Aug 2026, 10:16 · to BBC Three Counties Radio (3cr.news@bbc.co.uk) and The Comet (news@thecomet.net)

Subject: URGENT: 18m Hitchin telecom mast works begin despite Council confirming Prior Approval has not been obtained

Dear News Desk,

I am contacting you on behalf of concerned local residents regarding the proposed 18-metre telecommunications mast at Hawthorn Close, Hitchin, North Hertfordshire, planning reference 26/00508/EC.

Contractors have today arrived and works appear to have commenced, despite North Herts Council having confirmed to residents in writing that Prior Approval is required for the proposed mast and has not been obtained.

A North Herts Planning Officer has also confirmed in writing that if works proceed without the necessary permission or Prior Approval, the works would be unlawful and an enforcement investigation would be initiated. Residents were specifically advised to contact Planning Enforcement if works commenced. We have now alerted the Council’s Planning Enforcement Team that contractors are on site.

This follows considerable local concern about the mast. More than 150 residents opposed the previous proposal, yet residents were not directly alerted to the present situation and only became aware that works appeared imminent after “Essential Road Works” signs appeared locally stating that works would begin on 24 August.

We can provide: photographs and video of contractors and works on site; photographs of the roadworks notices; the relevant correspondence from North Herts Council confirming its position; details of the planning history and reference 26/00508/EC; and local residents who are willing to speak about their concerns.

We believe there is an important public-interest question as to how works on an 18-metre telecommunications mast could be allowed to commence after the local planning authority has confirmed that the necessary Prior Approval has not been obtained.

We would be very happy to provide the documentation and photographs immediately and to speak to a reporter.

Kind regards
A local resident, on behalf of the residents group

11 · Council → Residents Mon 24 Aug 2026, 12:02 · from the Senior Planning Officer · cc Cllrs Lucas & Hoskins

Good morning,

This is being investigated by my colleague in the Planning Enforcement team. They will be in touch shortly.

Kind regards
Senior Planning Officer, Development Management, North Herts Council

12 · Residents → Council Mon 24 Aug 2026, 15:34 · to the Senior Planning Officer & Planning Enforcement · cc Cllrs Lucas & Hoskins

Dear [officer],

Thank you for confirming that this matter is now being investigated by the Planning Enforcement Team.

I need to update you urgently that works have now commenced at the Hawthorn Close site today.

Given your previous confirmation that Prior Approval is required and has not been obtained, and that works proceeding without the necessary permission or Prior Approval would be unlawful and subject to an enforcement investigation, residents are extremely concerned that work is now actively taking place.

Could I therefore please ask, as a matter of urgency:

  • Can the Planning Enforcement Team contact those carrying out the works today and require works to cease while this is investigated?
  • Can you confirm whether an Enforcement Officer is able to attend the site today?
  • Can you confirm what residents should do if work continues in the meantime?
  • Please could the Enforcement Officer dealing with the matter contact me as soon as possible today.

We are continuing to photograph and document activity at the site and can provide this evidence immediately if required.

Given that physical works are now underway, I would be very grateful if this could be treated as urgent today, before the development progresses any further. I am copying the Planning Enforcement Team and our local councillors into this email so that everyone is aware of the latest position.

Kind regards
On behalf of concerned local residents

13 · Residents → EE (follow-up) Mon 24 Aug 2026, 17:05 · cc Planning Control, Planning Enforcement, Cllrs Hoskins & Lucas, Alistair Strathern MP

Subject: URGENT: Works commenced at Hawthorn Close – 18m mast – Council ref 26/00508/EC

Dear EE,

I am following up on my email of 23 August concerning the proposed 18m telecommunications mast at Hawthorn Close (North Herts Council ref 26/00508/EC). I appreciate that my original email was sent over the weekend; however, the situation has now become even more urgent as works commenced at the site today, 24 August. Photographs attached.

North Herts Council has confirmed in writing that Prior Approval is required for the proposed 18m mast and has not been obtained. The Council has also advised that if works proceed without the necessary permission or Prior Approval, the works would be unlawful and an enforcement investigation would be initiated.

Given that works are now underway, could EE please urgently confirm:

  • Whether these works are being undertaken on behalf of EE or for the EE network.
  • Whether EE has contacted the infrastructure provider/operator and contractors responsible for the works.
  • Whether those parties have been made aware of North Herts Council’s position.
  • What action EE is taking to ensure that no installation proceeds without the necessary planning approval.

This is now a matter of considerable concern to local residents and is extremely time-sensitive. The Council’s Planning Enforcement Team and our local councillors have also been notified that works have commenced. We have created a website documenting the history of the proposed mast and developments at the site, including photographs: hawthornclose.com.

I would therefore be grateful for an urgent response before any further installation works proceed.

Kind regards
On behalf of concerned local residents

Where it stands (Mon 24 Aug, afternoon): works are underway and Planning Enforcement is investigating (email 11). Residents have asked the Council to require works to cease and to send an Enforcement Officer to the site today (email 12), and have put EE formally on notice with photographs of the works (email 13). Cllr Keith Hoskins visited the site just after midday (see the photo wall). The councillors, the MP’s office and EE were all put on notice over the weekend, and BBC Three Counties Radio and The Comet have now been sent the full story with photographs. Seen anything? Photograph it and report to 01462 474000 / planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk.

If work starts

See workmen at the site? Do this.

Three steps

  • Don’t argue with or block them.
  • Phone the Council straight away on 01462 474000 and ask for Planning Enforcement. Say: “Work is starting at Hawthorn Close without Prior Approval — ref 26/00508/EC.” Then email planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk with your photos.
  • Take photos — the vans, the signs, the date and time.
01462 474000
North Herts Council — ask for Planning EnforcementMon–Fri office hours · planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk

What we’re doing

  • Watching the site and the Council’s planning list.
  • Keeping copies of every letter and photo.
  • Objecting formally if and when they apply.
  • Emailing you when anything changes.
Evidence

Photos from the site

The record of what’s happening, day by day. Taken anything at Hawthorn Close — contractors, vans, signs, the works? Add it here. Photos go to the residents’ record and may be shared with the Council, EE and the press.

Add a photo

Please don’t include people’s faces or number plates close-up where you can avoid it. Uploads are logged; anything off-topic will be removed.

Petition

No mast without proper consultation

residents have signed

    To North Herts Council and the mobile operator:

    We object to an 18-metre mast next to 53 Hawthorn Close without Prior Approval and proper consultation.

    We ask the Council to stop any work that starts without approval, and to refuse any application — as it refused the 20m mast in 2025.

    We ask the operator to withdraw the plan and find a site away from people’s homes.

    Add your name

    Takes 30 seconds. Your email is never shown.

    Your name and address may be shown to the Council and the operator as part of the petition. Privacy.

    Stay informed

    Get an email when something happens

    Only mast news: when they apply, when you can object, if workmen turn up. Nothing else.

    Contacts

    Who to call or email

    Residents’ campaign

    contact@hawthornclose.com

    Photos, letters, questions, offers of help — all welcome.

    North Herts Council, Planning

    01462 474000 — ask for Planning Enforcement
    Report works: planning.enforcement@north-herts.gov.uk
    Planning comments: planning.control@north-herts.gov.uk
    Quote ref 26/00508/EC

    Your councillors (Hitchin Priory)

    Cllr Keith Hoskins MBE
    keith.hoskins@north-herts.gov.uk
    Cllr Chris Lucas
    chris.lucas@north-herts.gov.uk

    Your MP

    Alistair Strathern MP
    Contact via Parliament
    Want the detail?

    The full story

    Tap a heading to open it. Everything is from the Council’s planning register or letters from the Council.

    Timeline, with planning references
    • August 2022

      Two equipment cabinets Council objected

      Notice to install two cabinets on the same land. Council objected, 14 Sep 2022.

    • May – June 2025

      20m mast with 9 antennas Refused

      EE applied for Prior Approval to replace the lamp-post with a 20m monopole and extra cabinets. Neighbours were consulted. Refused 27 June 2025 for scale, siting, appearance and visual impact.

      Ref 25/01258/TD · Applicant EE
    • 19 March 2026

      Notice of an 18m “Alpha” monopole Not an application

      The operator told the Council it would put up an 18m mast under “permitted development” — meaning no application and no consultation. The Council logged it as “No Objection” on 31 March.

    • August 2026

      Road-works signs appear. Council says: Prior Approval IS required Now

      A resident wrote to the Council. It replied in writing that Prior Approval is required and has not been sought, and told the operator so. If the operator wants to go on, it must apply — and residents will be consulted.

    What is “Prior Approval”?

    Mobile companies can put up some equipment without full planning permission. But for a mast like this they must first ask the Council to approve where it goes and what it looks like. The Council writes to neighbours, puts up a notice and can say no — which is what happened in 2025.

    Why did the March notice say “No Objection”?

    It was a notice, not an application — the Council wasn’t being asked to approve anything and nobody was consulted. Having looked again, the Council has confirmed in writing that an 18m mast does need Prior Approval.

    How to object when the time comes

    The Council can only consider where it is and what it looks like. So say, in your own words:

    • How tall it is compared with the houses, and what you’d see from your home and garden.
    • How close it is to homes, and whether a better site exists away from houses.
    • The clutter at the base — cabinets, lost verge, pavement.

    Individual letters count more than copies. Health worries about signals are not something the Council can refuse on, so lead with size and siting. Send objections via the planning register or to planning.control@north-herts.gov.uk.

    Will a petition stop it?

    Not on its own. It shows the Council how many people care. What matters most is lots of individual objections when the consultation opens — sign up above and we’ll tell you when.

    Who runs this site?

    Residents of Hawthorn Close, Cranborne Avenue and the immediate vicinity. Not the Council, not a political party. Spot a mistake? Email contact@hawthornclose.com.